![]() ![]() ![]() 20, 2009, Apple had agreed to make the entire source code of 1.1.1 available for inspection.īut then Apple reneged, the plaintiffs said. If Ware certifies the class, other iPhone users would be able to join the lawsuit.Īccording to documents submitted Wednesday to Ware, lawyers for Apple and the plaintiffs met numerous times last summer to hammer out an agreement to give the latter access to the iPhone 1.1.1 source code. 8 for filing a motion to grant the case class-action status. "Unless Plaintiffs are given access to Version 1.1.1 source code, their ability to prove the size and scope of the Class affected by Version 1.1.1 will be severely compromised and unfairly prejudiced," the motion read. The source code is necessary, they argued, in order to determine whether all iPhones were given the same 1.1.1 update, and whether it was designed to "brick" all or just some hacked iPhones. ![]() The plaintiffs in the case want to examine some of the iPhone 1.1.1 source code, including that for the kernel, the Core OS and Core Services layer, as well as for two programs - "Purple Restore" and "BBUpdater - which are used to update the iPhone's operating system and flash the phone's baseband chip. "People will try to break in, and it's our job to stop them breaking in." "It's a cat and mouse game," Jobs said at the time. Several days before iPhone 1.1.1 was released, Apple threatened to take action against users who had hacked their handsets, saying that doing so would "violate their iPhone software license agreement and void their warranty." Prior to that, Apple CEO Steve Jobs had said it was his company's job to stymie attempts to jailbreak the iPhone. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |